Feedback

Rearward Seating Orientation Decreases Trust and Increases Motion Sickness in Autonomous Vehicles

ORCID
0009-0003-7953-467X
Affiliation/Institute
Institut für Psychologie
Rottmann, Leonhard; Waldmann, Alina; Johannsen, Aniella; Vollrath, Mark

As the development of autonomous vehicles (AVs) progresses, new seating arrangements are emerging. Face-to-face seating is common in SAE L4 AV concepts and is intended to facilitate social interaction during autonomous driving, enabling previously unfeasible non-driving related tasks (NDRTs). However, this is countered by the unpopularity of rearward seating orientations, which is particularly pronounced in cars. In order to develop countermeasures to address this unpopularity, a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms is required. This study validates a model that predicts the acceptance of AVs and takes seating orientation into account. To this end, a study with N = 46 participants was conducted to investigate the influence of seating orientation on AV acceptance and related factors such as transparency, trust, and motion sickness. Additionally, internal human–machine interfaces (iHMIs) were evaluated in regard to their ability to compensate for the disadvantages of a rearward seating orientation. To achieve a realistic implementation of a fully functional SAE L4 AV, an experimental vehicle was equipped with a steering and pedal robot, performing self-driven journeys on a test track. The iHMIs provided information about upcoming maneuvers and detected road users. While engaged in a social NDRT, participants experienced a total of six journeys. Seating orientation and iHMI visualization were manipulated between journeys. Rearward-facing passengers showed lower levels of trust and higher levels of motion sickness than forward-facing passengers. However, the iHMIs had no effect on acceptance or related factors. Based on these findings, an updated version of the model is proposed, showing that rearward-facing passengers in autonomous vehicles pose a particular challenge for trust calibration and motion sickness mitigation. During NDRTs, iHMIs which depend on the attention of AV occupants for information transfer appear to be ineffective. Implications for future research and design of iHMIs to address this challenge are discussed.

Rights

Use and reproduction:

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.