Feedback

Test Methods for the Mechanical Characterization of Flexure Hinges

ORCID
0000-0001-7308-5138
Affiliation/Institute
Institute of Mechanics and Adaptronics, Technische Universität Braunschweig
Meyer, Patrick;
ORCID
0009-0007-5252-1640
Affiliation/Institute
Institute of Mechanics and Adaptronics, Technische Universität Braunschweig
Finder, J.;
ORCID
0000-0002-2218-1223
Affiliation/Institute
Institute of Mechanics and Adaptronics, Technische Universität Braunschweig
Hühne, C.

Background

The design of compliant mechanisms requires detailed knowledge about the stiffness properties of their flexible segments. However, there are no standardized test methods for flexure hinges, and therefore the influence of manufacturing-specific effects, such as anisotropy, on the stiffness properties cannot be quantified.

Objective

This paper presents novel test methods for variable cross-section flexure hinges subjected to large deformations and pure bending loading, which determine the bending stiffness of flexure hinges over their entire deflection range using a universal testing machine.

Methods

The novel test methods for flexure hinges are based on the tensile test, the four-point bending test (FPBT), and the column bending test (CBT). These test methods were initially formulated for constant cross-section specimens, but are adapted in this study to examine variable cross-section specimens. The derived test methods are validated by using isotropic materials with well-known properties and by comparing the calculated deflections with deflections measured by means of image processing.

Results

The deflection validation shows that the adapted CBT (aCBT) is accurate over the entire deflection range, achieving curvature of up to κ=0.40mm−1

, whereas the maximum curvature in the adapted FPBT (aFPBT) is limited by the test methodology to about κ=0.15mm−1

. At small strains, the flexural modulus determined in the aCBT and aFPBT agrees well with the Young’s modulus determined in the tensile test, as would be expected for isotropic materials.

Conclusion

The aCBT proves to be a suitable test method for flexure hinges at large deflections, whereas the stiffness characterization at small deflections can be performed with both the aCBT and the aFPBT. The presented test methods validated on isotropic materials form the basis for characterizing anisotropic flexure hinges with geometry-dependent stiffness properties.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Access Statistic

Total:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:
Last 12 Month:
Downloads:
Abtractviews:

Rights

Use and reproduction: